Ever since happiness heard your name, it has been running through the streets trying to find you.
I wish I could show you when you are lonely or in the darkness, the astonishing light of your own being. (Hafiz)
Category: misc/personal
Cubs First Steps
i know people’s views on zoos r divided, but this is unbearably cute! thx mimi for sharing with me.
happy 2014!
The choice between love and fear is made every moment in our hearts and minds. That is where the peace process begins. Without peace within, peace in the world is an empty wish. Like love, peace is extended. It cannot be brought from the world to the heart. It must be brought from each heart to another, and thus to all mankind. (Paul Ferrini)
happy new year to all my beautiful family, friends, and compadres in the struggle for justice and therefore peace, within ourselves and throughout the world. bring it on 2014!
happy holidays!
From Teju Cole
The second chapter of the fifth volume of the Truth and Reconciliation Commission of South Africa Report is entitled “Victims of Gross Violations of Human Rights.” It contains a long list of names in alphabetical order. The document says there will be more names to come. But this, already, is a rich and representative sample. Take any section, and it could have come from a Johannesburg phone book:
MATISO, Peace
MATISO, Sithembele
MATITI, Zandisile
MATIWANA, Hombakazi
MATIWANA, Nontombi Beauty
MATIWANA, Siphiwe Headman
MATIWANE, David Ndumiso
MATIWANE, Lungisa Welcome
MATJEE, Lawrence
The names run into hundreds. Folded into the neat letters of each name is an invisible horror. We know a little more about one of these names, Lawrence Matjee, because David Goldblatt took a photograph of him in 1985. No one in the history of photography ever captioned photographs more scrupulously than did Goldblatt:
Fifteen Year Old Lawrence Matjee After His Assault And Detention By The Security Police, Khotso House, De Villiers Street, Johannesburg, 25 October 1985
“Yes, they tortured people here,” my friend says. She points out the building. It has a façade of blue tile. This is John Vorster Square, headquarters of the security police. In the old days people went into this building and came out lessened, if they came out at all. It was an evil place. The victim, by continuing to suffer, irritates the oppressor, who would rather be already past it. We drive on in silence. Will there someday be another Truth and Reconciliation Commission? One that features names like Faisal bin Ali Gaber, Nabila Rehman, and Zubair Rehman? Maybe. But should such a day ever come, if history’s any guide, we won’t be ready to forgive those people for what we did to them.
rochester in december
The Science of Sex
Guernica: In the book, you reference a quote by the British gynecologist William Acton, who wrote in the Victorian era: “The majority of women, happily for society, are not very much troubled by sexual feeling of any kind.” The message there being that women’s sexuality, if unleashed, could upend civilization. Times have changed, but your book suggests that elements of that logic persist.
Daniel Bergner: If we cast back to Victorian times as they’re encapsulated in that Acton quotation, we see this really severe denial of women’s desire, and that denial is mixed in with a level of fear. That carries forward to our society. Women’s sexuality surrounds us, but right beneath that there’s this other standard for women’s desire that’s still informed by uneasiness. It’s linked, ultimately, to the comfort that we all get—men and society as a whole—from this idea that women are somehow less desiring than men. We can still lean on women a little bit to keep society stable. The dichotomy that’s set up is that men are animals and anarchic in their lust and women are civilized and civilizing in their sexuality. More here.
from: thirty seven practices of bodhisattvas by ngulchu togmay zangpo
without ethics u cannot accomplish ur own well-being,
so wanting to accomplish others’ is laughable.
therefore without worldly aspirations
safeguard ur ethical discipline –
this is the practice of bodhisattvas.
an honest conversation
last week i had a guy come in to service our heating system. i had never met him before. as i was leading him to the furnace, he asked me where i was from. i said: “from here.” he said: “yes, but what’s ur nationality?” i said: “american.” he sniggered and went to work. later he started telling me about how he had been in the navy and didn’t believe in “negativity” and had friends from pakistan and israel and all kinds of exotic places. he said: “do u like thai food?” after i told him i did, he said: “oh yeah, coz u must love curries.” i told him not particularly. he asked me about good indian restaurants. i still didn’t commit to any foreign nationality. as he was leaving, he told me i shouldn’t be offended by his questions. he’s not “negative” about any religion or ethnicity. he even watches the BBC. i told him to watch democracy now. also, i said: “since u keep digging, let me tell u something. ur questions r intrusive and u only asked them because i’m not white. what’s ur nationality? i’m sure u’re not native american. what r ur roots? what’s ur food? ur story? why do u feel entitled to ask me personal questions about my background when we don’t even know each other? because i’m not white?” he thought about it and agreed that i was right. he said goodbye and thanked me for teaching him a valuable lesson. he said: “next time i’ll just say hello mara and get to work.” good idea.
sept 29, 2013: “breaking bad” ends…
my husband encapsulates “breaking bad” which came to a much anticipated close tonight: a lesson in what happens when u don’t have single-payer national health insurance. word.
sept 27, 2013
On being human
From my friend Ryan Hunt:
The following simple quote, commonly attributed to Roman slave-turned-playwright Terence, is at the heart of my practice of psychotherapy. It remains as true and relevant today as when it was first articulated over two millennia ago: “I am a human being, I consider nothing that is human alien to me.”
Jewish dervishes Agha-Jaan Darvish and his brother, patriarchs of the Darvish family, Tehran, Iran, c.1922
Because of its specific association with Sufism and its ensuing identification with Islam, dervishhood is an order comprised almost exclusively of Muslim practicioners. The two Jewish dervishes pictured here in this rare photograph are among the very few who had successfully been integrated into the order without converting to Islam. Like the Jewish practitioners of a traditional Iranian sport in the houses of strength (zurkhaneh) — a sport that is profoundly intertwined with Islamic ritual — these dervishes represent a uniquely Iranian hybrid of Judaism and Islam. More here.
The Science of Why We Don’t Believe Science
Chris Mooney: The theory of motivated reasoning builds on a key insight of modern neuroscience: Reasoning is actually suffused with emotion (or what researchers often call “affect”). Not only are the two inseparable, but our positive or negative feelings about people, things, and ideas arise much more rapidly than our conscious thoughts, in a matter of milliseconds—fast enough to detect with an EEG device, but long before we’re aware of it. That shouldn’t be surprising: Evolution required us to react very quickly to stimuli in our environment. It’s a “basic human survival skill,” explains political scientist Arthur Lupia of the University of Michigan. We push threatening information away; we pull friendly information close.
We apply fight-or-flight reflexes not only to predators, but to data itself.
We’re not driven only by emotions, of course—we also reason, deliberate. But reasoning comes later, works slower—and even then, it doesn’t take place in an emotional vacuum. Rather, our quick-fire emotions can set us on a course of thinking that’s highly biased, especially on topics we care a great deal about.
Consider a person who has heard about a scientific discovery that deeply challenges her belief in divine creation—a new hominid, say, that confirms our evolutionary origins. What happens next, explains political scientist Charles Taber of Stony Brook University, is a subconscious negative response to the new information—and that response, in turn, guides the type of memories and associations formed in the conscious mind. “They retrieve thoughts that are consistent with their previous beliefs,” says Taber, “and that will lead them to build an argument and challenge what they’re hearing.” In other words, when we think we’re reasoning, we may instead be rationalizing. Or to use an analogy offered by University of Virginia psychologist Jonathan Haidt: We may think we’re being scientists, but we’re actually being lawyers. More here.
love this…
une légende dit que quand vous ne pouvez pas dormir la nuit c’est que vous êtes éveillé(e) dans le rêve de quelqu’un d’autre.